Precautionary proportionality principle as an instrumental preventive measure from the COVID-19: Can European human rights survive in the state of public health emergency?
Precautionary proportionality principle as an instrumental preventive measure from the COVID-19: Can European human rights survive in the state of public health emergency?
Author(s): Jizeng Fan, Yuhong WangSubject(s): Politics / Political Sciences, Law, Constitution, Jurisprudence, Political Sciences
Published by: Wydawnictwa Uniwersytetu Warszawskiego
Keywords: COVID-19; Europe; coronavirus; human rights; sovereignty; rule of law; fundamental rights protection; proportionality principle; precautionary principle
Summary/Abstract: The authors believe that the C. Schmitt’s notion of unconstraint sovereignty is not flawless. Both A. Dicey’s theory of British constitutional law and the international human rights instruments have required the measures of the derogation of human rights must be given in accordance with proportionality principle. However, these normative requirements have hardly been applied to the judicial scrutiny by the two supranational courts in Europe. Correspondingly, some European public authorities favour the more radical precautionary principle. Although this principle is more effective in suppressing the new coronavirus, it is associated with numerous side effects. Thus, the authors propose in this article an innovative concept of precautionary proportionality principle.
Journal: Przegląd Europejski
- Issue Year: 2021
- Issue No: 1
- Page Range: 117-143
- Page Count: 27
- Language: English