CAN IT BE OR FEEL RIGHT TO HATE? ON THE APPROPRIATENESS AND FITTINGNESS OF HATRED Cover Image

CAN IT BE OR FEEL RIGHT TO HATE? ON THE APPROPRIATENESS AND FITTINGNESS OF HATRED
CAN IT BE OR FEEL RIGHT TO HATE? ON THE APPROPRIATENESS AND FITTINGNESS OF HATRED

Author(s): Thomas Szanto
Subject(s): Ethics / Practical Philosophy, Studies in violence and power
Published by: Institut za filozofiju i društvenu teoriju
Keywords: hatred; moral hatred; morality of emotions; antagonistic emotions; reality of evil; dehumanization; emotional fittingness; theory of values; affective intentionality; corporate and group agents

Summary/Abstract: What exactly is wrong with hating others? However deep-seated the intuition, when it comes to spelling out the reasons for why hatred is inappropriate, the literature is rather meager and confusing. In this paper, I attempt to be more precise by distinguishing two senses in which hatred is inappropriate, a moral and a non-moral one. First, I critically discuss the central current proposals defending the possibility of morally appropriate hatred in the face of serious wrongs or evil perpetrators and show that they are all based on a problematic assumption, which I call the ‘reality of evil agents assumption’. I then turn to the issue of non-moral emotional appropriateness and sketch a novel, focus-based account of fittingness. Next, I outline the distinctive affective intentionality of hatred, suggesting that hatred, unlike most other antagonistic emotions, has an overgeneralizing and indeterminate affective focus. Against this background, I argue that hatred cannot be fitting. Due to the indeterminacy of its focus, hatred fails to pick out those evaluative features of the intentional object that would really matter to the emoters. I close with some tentative remarks on the possibility of appropriate hatred towards corporate or group agents.

  • Issue Year: 32/2021
  • Issue No: 3
  • Page Range: 341-368
  • Page Count: 28
  • Language: English
Toggle Accessibility Mode