Constante ale Dreptului, constante sociale - constante contrastante?
Constants of Law, Social Constants - Contrasting Constants?

Author(s): Cristian Neacsiu
Subject(s): Law, Constitution, Jurisprudence, Philosophy of Law
Published by: Universul Juridic
Keywords: Constant; Continuity; Constancy; Actualize;
Summary/Abstract: Since by defining what is implicitly constant the aspect of a continuity in temporality is verified, the further question is justifiably asked whether the idea of constant implies and signifies only the aspect of continuity in temporality? As any interruption of continuity represents an opening to another continuity which thus actualizes itself, it follows that in order to be characterized by constancy, a continuity must not know interruption. Therefore, continuity as constant is that which is not fractured by the act of interruption. Regarding the latter relationship, it is necessary to mention the aspect that its object is represented by continuity, and the feature that applies to it is represented by constant character. But, viewed from the opposite direction, could a relationship be conceptualized in which what is constant as uniformity has its object value, respectively continuity represents the feature that applies to the object?

• Details
• Contents