Series:CEEOL COLLECTION related to SOUTH-EAST EUROPE

Itinerary through Bosnia, Serbia, Bulgaria and Rumelia in 1530

Putopis kroz Bosnu, Srbiju, Bugarsku i Rumeliju 1530

Author(s): Benedikt Kuripešić / Language(s): Croatian

Byzantine Culture

Vizantijska Kultura

Author(s): Jaroslav Bidlo / Language(s): Croatian

Published in 1924 by HRV. ŠTAMPARSKI ZAVOD D.D., ZAGREB. Translated from Czech to Croatian with permission of the author by Dr. Milan Prelog

An analysis of the crisis of the French franc

Analiza krize francuskog franka

Author(s): B. Sedmak / Language(s): Croatian

Extract from the issue 1/1938 of the journal Znanost i život

Italy and the Balkans (on the occasion of the Pan-European War)

Италия и Балканитѣ (по случай общоевропейската война)

Author(s): D-r. Slivenson / Language(s): Bulgarian

A print of the Military Journal, September 15, 1915, referring to Italy's policy on the Balkans.

The European Union and the Balkans. From Stabilisation Process to Southeastern Enlargement

The European Union and the Balkans. From Stabilisation Process to Southeastern Enlargement

Author(s): Wim van Meurs,Alexandros Yannis / Language(s): English

Keywords: EU Enlargement to South-East; Thessaloniki promis;

PUBLISHED IN SEPTEMBER 2002 BY THE CENTER FOR APPLIED POLICY RESEARCH at MUNICH UNIVERSITY. Adopting an Agenda for Southeastern enlargement would signify the progressive and balanced shift of the position of the international community and the local leadership: from stabilisation to enlargement; from international micro-management of the region to macro-management with greater local responsibilities; and from an international institutional proliferation to an integral institutional framework. The development of a flexible and informal common roof under which all current strategic objectives, actors and initiatives would be re-arranged to create dynamic synergies would be the acknowledgement of this paradigm shift. The above strategic complementarity and institutional congruence of the Southeastern enlargement process has to be consolidated in the next 2-3 years with the 2004/2005 Eastern enlargement as a deadline. // In conclusion, what may have worked reasonably well in Eastern enlargement process requires additional endeavours in the case of Southeastern enlargement due to the qualitatively and quantitatively different challenges this region poses. A consistent Agenda for Southeastern Enlargement after 2004, including the establishment of an Informal Consultation Council to provide the much-needed strategic and institutional coherence and orientation under EU leadership as well as an enhanced Stabilisation and Association Process will be needed soon, in order to secure a credible Balkan trajectory to Europe.