Pozdravni govori
Opening Speech: Scientific conference 2014 - Bjelovar i Bjelovarsko-bilogorska županija u Domovinskom ratu
More...We kindly inform you that, as long as the subject affiliation of our 300.000+ articles is in progress, you might get unsufficient or no results on your third level or second level search. In this case, please broaden your search criteria.
Opening Speech: Scientific conference 2014 - Bjelovar i Bjelovarsko-bilogorska županija u Domovinskom ratu
More...
У Историјском архиву „Тимочка крајина“ у Зајечару 1. и 2. новембра 2018. одржан је дводневни научно-стручни скуп Историја медицине, фармације, ветерине и народна здравствена култура, јубиларни, десети по реду, који је окупио стручне раднике различитих професија: лекаре, архивисте, историчаре, истраживаче и др.
More...
Odluka o dodjeli Godišnje književne nagrade „Antun Branko Šimić“.
More...
Politička nauka sadržajno provocira. Sve je u njoj pod pitanjem: pretpostavke, određenje, kriteriji, osnovne kategorije. Čini se, što se više politika sprovodi, to smo dalje od toga da je smisleno odredimo.
More...
Jugoslovensko udruženje za političke nauke održat će u mjesecu ožujku ove godine u Zagrebu redovnu godišnju skupštinu.
More...
Kao i savjetovanje o Idejnom projektu o političkim sistemima i pokretima u nerazvijenim zemljama — i ovo je bilo organizirano od strane Instituta za izučavanje radničkog pokreta u Beogradu. Iz redova njegovih suradnika potječu i autori novog projekta.
More...
Savjetovanje o Idejnom projektu za proučavanje političkih sistema i pokrete u nerazvijenim zemljama organizirao je Institut za izučavanje radničkog pokreta u Beogradu. Iz redova njegovih suradnika (Sekcija za nerazvijene zemlje) potječu i autori vrlo opsežnog, studioznog i do sada jedinstvenog Projekta koji sadrži niz teza u okviru kojih bi trebalo doći ,i na širem opće jugoslavenskom planu, do proučavanja suvremenih društvenih kretanja u nerazvijenim zemljama.
More...
Prieš aštuoniasdešimt metų, 1938 m. lapkričio 26 d., Suvalkijoje gimė Jonas Klimavičius, vienas iš tų kalbininkų, kurį pažįsta ir vertina ne tik kolegos kalbininkai, redaktoriai, stilistai, bet ir plačioji visuomenė. Humanitarinių mokslų daktaras, kalbininkas, terminologas, leksikologas, terminografas, leksikografas, kalbos normintojas, kalbos kultūros ugdytojas, redaktorius, redaktorių kolegijų narys, vertėjas, konsultantas, autorius, ekspertas, recenzentas, poetas... – tai tik maža dalis apibūdinimų, tinkančių kalbant apie J. Klimavičių ir įvairią bei plačią jo mokslinę veiklą. Graži 80-ies metų sukaktis – puiki proga aptarti be galo darbštaus ir uolaus kalbininko gyvenimą ir darbus.
More...
The review process is intended to provide an objective assessment of the suitability of a submission to the target journal. When authors receive the decision letter from the editor it is almost always accompanied with the reviews, which at times can be quite critical. Writing a well-constructed response letter to the reviewers, with well-reasoned arguments, is a key part of the reviewing process. Although the manuscript is the main focus of the submission, the content and tone of the response letter can have a surprisingly large impact on the eventual recommendation given by the reviewers. The importance of writing a clear response letter is often overlooked by authors. This prompted us to prepare a short article addressing the main points that can help authors prepare their response to reviewer letter to the reviewers. Although each review is unique, here, we outline ten points which are aimed at helping authors respond effectively and clearly to reviewers’ comments. The points are based on the authors’ collective experiences which includes publishing and reviewing for international peer-reviewed journals. The tone of the letter should always be professional, organized and objective. Each point raised by the reviewers needs to be replied to in a precise way, with clear evidence that the major concerns have been considered in a serious way. This article also covers what information should be included, when it is appropriate to disagree with a reviewer, and how to present appropriate rebuttals.
More...
17 февраля 2018 г. исполняется 70 лет Альбине Мазгаровне Саяповой, замечательному российскому литературоведу, доктору филологических наук, профессору кафедры русской и зарубежной литературы Казанского (Приволжского) федерального университета, специалисту в области русской и татарской классических литератур, русско-татарских литературных взаимосвязей, теории сравнительного анализа и интерпретации.
More...
21 января 2018 г. исполнилось 80 лет со дня рождения Валерия Николаевича Коновалова1 , доктора филологических наук, профессора, заведующего кафедрой русской и зарубежной литературы Казанского университета (1988–1998), основателя научного направления по изучению русской литературной критики в её генезисе, развитии и диалогах с общественным сознанием.
More...
The author describes the characteristics of a decade and a half long life of Arche trying to examine the foundation of the Journal in the light of the question concerning immanent philosophical purposefulness of a work on philosophical periodicals in general. Considering that work on philosophical periodicals could be understood as one of the aspects of the opening of the philosophy to its own developementallity and temporality, Arche could be viewed as the dialogic medium in which constantly subjectivizes themselves what, from the very beginning, has been understood at the Department of Philosophy in Novi Sad as the substantiality of philosophical thought. The paper considers the profiling of the editorial policy of Arche as the highest manifestation of that process.
More...