![«MAIORA QUIS PONDERA TIBI COMMODAVIT CUM EMERES AD PONDUS». БЕЛЕЖКИ КЪМ D. 47.2.52.22 (ULP., 37 AD ED.)](/api/image/getissuecoverimage?id=picture_2021_65544.jpg)
«MAIORA QUIS PONDERA TIBI COMMODAVIT CUM EMERES AD PONDUS». БЕЛЕЖКИ КЪМ D. 47.2.52.22 (ULP., 37 AD ED.)
The article is aimed at a thorough analysis of the solution of a legal case originally offered by Mela and then proposed again by Ulpian, regarding the lending of pondera maiora, which were used by the borrower to weigh goods for the purpose of purchasing said goods. Mela identifies the lender of the weights as a legitimate subject to an actio furti brought in by the seller of those goods; the text also contains an additional remark that the borrower/buyer will have to respond to the same action, if he has scientia about the incorrectness of the weights. The author examines the various hypotheses brought forward by scholars so far, and offers a new interpretative key to the case in an attempt to understand the reasoning that might have led Mela to his solution – a reasoning, which possibly might have been more sophisticated than recognized until now.
More...