Author(s): Mioara-Ketty Guiu / Language(s): Romanian
Publication Year: 0
This study starts from the observation that nowadays, more and more authors speak of a "crisis of law", especially of a "crisis of penal dogmatics", and it is trying to clarify how this situation came about. To this end, the author makes a foray into the history of law, which reveals, in summary, the following: the fact that legal science was not born in the modern era, but dates back to early antiquity; the fact that unlike other sciences (most), which present themselves as empirical sciences, legal science presents itself, par excellence, as a formal science, which derives directly from the general logic (metaphysica generalis); the fact that, like all sciences, legal science consists of two parts, namely a general part (purely theoretical) and a special part (applicative); the fact that until the modern era, prevailed the view that legal science and, in particular, its general part presents itself as a philosophical discipline, with a high degree of abstraction, which can progress, only by virtue of a normative conception, that is, taking into account that, by its rules, the law creates a (ideal) juridical reality, with own entities, which never coincides with the concrete, objectively existing reality; the fact that the regression or "crisis" of law started in the middle of the nineteenth century (after Hegel's death), when idealistic philosophy went into decline, to make way for a materialistic and deterministic conception; the fact that, from that moment on, legal science abandoned the normative conception in favor of a naturalistic conception, according to the new ”philosophy about the world and life"; the fact that overcoming the state of crisis is possible only in one way, namely returning to the old conception, normative, as claimed, in particular, by the German penalists.
More...
