EVALUAREA DIALECTICĂ A APELULUI LA VALORI ÎN ARGUMENTAREA DELIBERATIVĂ PUBLICĂ
DIALECTICAL EVALUATION OF THE APPEAL TO VALUES IN DELIBERATIVE ARGUMENTATION
Author(s): Cătălin StănciulescuSubject(s): Logic, Contemporary Philosophy, Rhetoric
Published by: Editura Universitaria Craiova
Keywords: Argumentation Schemes; Douglas Walton; quarrel as a type of argumentation dialogue; „deep disagreement"; irrelevance; clashing commitments;
Summary/Abstract: This paper uses the argumentation schemes for The Situationally Disqualifying Type of Ad Hominem Argument, Poisoning the Well by Alleging Group Bias, and Poisoning the Well as Ad Hominem Argument (Walton, 2006) to model some cases of so-called „deep disagreement" (Fogelin, 1985; Lugg, 1986; Friemann, 2005, Turner and Wright, 2005; Kock, 2003, 2007a, 2007b, 2009a, 2009b) as identified in some of the classic dialogues in the Sophocles' Antigone (Krabbe, 1990).
Journal: ANALELE UNIVERSITĂȚII DIN CRAIOVA. SERIA FILOSOFIE
- Issue Year: 1/2012
- Issue No: 29
- Page Range: 113-129
- Page Count: 17
- Language: Romanian
