Zarządzanie partycypacyjne czy imperatywne władztwo w wymiarze sprawiedliwości
Participative management or imperative reign in the justice system

Summary/Abstract: The goal of the article is an attempt to give an answer to the question whether the concepts of compromise on the management of the public administration may be used in the management of the justice system and if so to what extent? The article presents selected concepts of the management of the public sector with regards to their possibilities of adaptation for the needs of the justice system. It also shows the specificity of justice system Justice system plays an important role in the course of shaping an efficient state. In the light of the praxeological understanding the state is an organization, i.e. the entirety consisting of linked different networks contributing to the success or inducing failure of the entirety. A poorly managed justice system as a part of the entirety may be a serious obstacle on the way to modernize the management of the country. Therefore the discussion over the optimal model of management of justice system becomes an urgent challenge in the science of management. The prevailing role of justice system is meting out justice and other functions must comply with the prevailing role – ergo they play an ancillary role to the main role. No one and nothing may interfere in the competences of the independent court in meting out justice even the internal and external administrative supervision. It seems that the response to the needs of the justice system may be the model of participative bureaucracy as a combination of different bureaucratic models and other organizational models with the awareness of the needs of the responsible court.

• Details
• Contents