Cererea de intervenţie vădit şicanatorie
The application of the intervention obvious cavil

Summary/Abstract: Voluntary intervention representing legal instrument made by law to the third party seeking participation in a process currently under trial remains to determine whether its purpose is legitimate and moral. In the article we will analyze the premises in which intervening third party whose application to intervene was rejected as inadmissible attempts maliciously delaying. We consider that an application to intervene is inadmissible where its author does not fulfill all the conditions of eligibility or, in bad faith or personal interest of any party to the legal relationship in dispute would suspend judgment manifestly course. It remains so to answer every time, and if the court is obliged to suspend the judgment when it is called on application for action manifestly unfounded and the third party makes an appeal against the first-instance solution.

• Details
• Contents