Съставлява ли абсолютна процесуална пречка
за съществуването и надлежното упражняване на право на иск за отнемане в полза на държавата на незаконно придобито имущество, прекратяването на наказателното производство за престъпление
Does the termination of criminal proceedings for a crime constitute
an absolute procedural obstacle for the existence and lawful exercise of the right of claim for forfeiture of illegally acquired property to the state?
A crime under the scope of art. 22, paragraph 1 of the Forfeiture in Favour of the State of Illegally Acquired Assets Act Law, but is outside of the scope of art. 22, paragraph 2 of the Forfeiture in Favour of the State of Illegally Acquired Assets
Author(s): Nikolay D. KolevSubject(s): Law, Constitution, Jurisprudence, Human Rights and Humanitarian Law, Canon Law / Church Law, Sociology of Law
Published by: Великотърновски университет „Св. св. Кирил и Методий”
Keywords: illegally acquired property, non-conviction based civil confiscation; criminal proceedings
Summary/Abstract: This article explores whether the termination of criminal proceedings against the respondent in the application based on Art. 74, par. 1 of the Law on Forfeiture of the State of illegally acquired property is sufficient reason for supersedes case.
Journal: De Jure
- Issue Year: 14/2017
- Issue No: 1
- Page Range: 71-77
- Page Count: 8
- Language: Bulgarian
