Компетентен ли е арбитражен съд да разглежда спорове за стопанска непоносимост по приватизационни сделки /Критичен анализ на решение № 189/09.11.2017 г. по т.д. № 1675/2017 г. на ВКС- I т. о./
Is an Arbitration Competent to Hear Disputes on Business Frustration at Privatization Contracts /Critical Analysis of Decision No. 189/09.11.2017 - commercial caseNo. 1675/2017 of the Supreme Court of Cassation – 1st Department/
Author(s): Ognyan Stamboliev, Aneliya MingovaSubject(s): Law, Constitution, Jurisprudence, Civil Law
Published by: Институт за държавата и правото - Българска академия на науките
Keywords: аrbitration; arbitrability; arbitration agreement; business frustration; privatization contract; non-arbitrability
Summary/Abstract: The article reviews the question of the arbitrability of disputes on business frustration of privatization contracts in the light of a decision under Art.47 of ICAA rendered by the Supreme Court of Cassation. The critical analysis concludes that the prohibition on the renegotiation of privatization contracts established in the imperative provision of Art. 32, para. 5 of the PPCA does not lead either to the inference of non-arbitrability of business frustration disputes or to the conclusion that they are a priori without merits.
Journal: Научни трудове на Института за държавата и правото
- Issue Year: 2017
- Issue No: XVI
- Page Range: 237-250
- Page Count: 14
- Language: Bulgarian
- Content File-PDF