Acordul de mediere. Conflictul de interpretări între Curtea Constituţională a României și Înalta Curte de Casaţie și Justiţie. Aplicabilitatea lor din perspectiva legii penale mai favorabile
The mediation agreement. The conflict of exposition between the Romanian Constitutional Court and the High Court of Cassation and Justice. Their enfrorcement from the perspective of a more favorable criminal law
Author(s): Parchetul de pe langa Curtea de Apel Alba Iulia Sectia JudiciaraSubject(s): Law, Constitution, Jurisprudence
Published by: Universul Juridic
Keywords: law enforcement / adjudication decision; Constitutional Court; High Court of Cassation and Justice; more favorable criminal law;
Summary/Abstract: When there is a conflict of interpretation regarding the same issue of law – resulting from the decisions of the Constitutional Court and the High Court of Cassation and Justice, mandatory according to the law – the priority application of one or the other of them can be done in terms of more favorable criminal law (norm).
Journal: Revista Pro Lege
- Issue Year: 2017
- Issue No: 4
- Page Range: 141-143
- Page Count: 4
- Language: Romanian