GRANICE OVLAŠĆENJA USTAVNOG SUDA BOSNE I HERCEGOVINE U POSTUPKU OCJENE SAGLASNOSTI ZAKONA SA USTAVOM BOSNE I HERCEGOVINE
The Limits of Authority of the Constitutional Court of Bosnia and Herzegovina in the Procedure for the Assessment of Compliance of Laws with the Constitution of Bosnia and Herzegovina

Summary/Abstract: The Constitutional Court of Bosnia and Herzegovina is one of the pillars of rule of law and legal security as well as guarantee for preservation and development of democratic order in the constitutional framework of Bosnia and Herzegovina. It is not legislative, neither executive nor classical court authority, but a special kind of sui generis authority, acting as corrective factor for all three authority branches. In such a situation, the relationship between the Constitutional Court and legislative authority has a special significance, having in mind that legislative authority regulates, primarily through the law, legal order and, thereby, also defines social and political system of one state and that, on the other side, the Constitutional Court ensures that those laws are in accordance with the Constitution of Bosnia and Herzegovina and that, if it finds such a law has gone out of the framework of the Constitution, it may intervene by declaring the whole law or parts of it unconstitutional and put them out of force. Does the Constitutional Court in such a situation takes the role of legislator and what kind of legislator? What if the legislative authority does not comply with the decision of the Constitutional Court? Should Constitutional Court take the role of positive legislator? It is less problematic activity of the Constitutional Court as negative legislator in theory and practice. In such legal situation, the Constitutional Court in its decision finds unconstitutionality of a law provision (or the whole law) and eliminates it from legal system generally after expiration of certain period of time when such provisions cease to be valid and the legislator replaces unconstitutional provisions with new ones within set time limit. However, we have a much more problematic situation when the Constitutional Court acts as positive legislation, i.e. when it makes a decision declaring validity of certain provisions of the law or instructing the legislator which actions should it take for a law to be in accordance with the Constitution of Bosnia and Herzegovina. And that is the difference from actions of the Constitutional Court as negative legislator.

• Details
• Contents