The “Medium-Term” has passed for three of the Eastern Partnership Countries. How does the Neighbourhood Policy react? Cover Image

The “Medium-Term” has passed for three of the Eastern Partnership Countries. How does the Neighbourhood Policy react?
The “Medium-Term” has passed for three of the Eastern Partnership Countries. How does the Neighbourhood Policy react?

Author(s): Dorin-Mircea Dobra
Subject(s): International relations/trade, EU-Accession / EU-DEvelopment
Published by: Facultatea de Studii Europene -Universitatea Babeş-Bolyai
Keywords: EU enlargement; Eastern Partnership; European Neighbourhood Policy; Eastern European countries; Euro-fatigue;

Summary/Abstract: Since the adoption of the European Neighbourhood Policy, criticism has been direc-ted to the lack of policy instruments correlated with the objectives of the countries concerned. Following the evolution of relations between the EU and the six Eastern Partnership countries, three of the latter are proposing an EU accession project in the future. The EU has configured the evolution of these partnerships through Summits dedicated to the Eastern Partnership. At the request of Ukraine, Georgia and the Republic of Moldavia, the EU is owed with clarifications and options on the prospects for European accession for the three. The summit this year could offer such an opportunity if the EU were not caught up in so many dilemmas about its own future.

  • Issue Year: 2018
  • Issue No: 26
  • Page Range: 26-38
  • Page Count: 13
  • Language: English
Toggle Accessibility Mode