Abaterea disciplinară prevăzută de art. 99 lit. g), m) și h) din Legea nr. 303/2004 privind statutul judecătorilor și procurorilor. Jurisprudență
The disciplinary violation provided by art. 99 letters g), m) and h) of Law no. 303/2004 on the status of judges and prosecutors. Jurisprudence

Summary/Abstract: Meets the constitutive elements of the official misconduct provided by art. 99 letter g) of Law no. 303/2004 on the status of judges and prosecutors, republished, with subsequent amendments and completions, the deed of the chief prosecutor for non-compliance with Order no. 5 of 10.01.2007 of the General Prosecutor of the Prosecutor's Office attached to the High Court of Cassation and Justice, which regulates the way in which the ECRIS information system is used in the prosecutor's offices. The constitutive elements of the official misconduct provided by art. 99 letter m) of Law no. 303/2004 on the status of judges and prosecutors, republished, with subsequent amendments and completions, the deed of the chief prosecutor to distribute the files after a very long time from registration, thus violating the provisions of art. 129 para. (4) and (5) of the Regulation of internal order of the prosecutor's offices, as well as his act of not completing, according to the provisions of art. 136 of the Regulation of internal order of the prosecutor's offices, the record of the files and works of the prosecutors, provided by art. 175 B point 1 of the same regulation. The constitutive elements of the official misconduct provided by art. 99 letter h) of Law no. 303/2004 on the status of judges and prosecutors, republished, with subsequent amendments and completions, the deeds of the Chief Prosecutor to leave inactive criminal files for periods between 9 months and 1 year and 5 months, as well as to resolve requests for recusal and complaints against solutions exceeding the deadlines provided by legal provisions.

• Details
• Contents