DE L’ANTÉPRÉDICATIF HUSSERLIEN AU PROTO-ONTIQUE GARELLIEN ET AU CLIGNOTEMENT RICHIRIEN – POUR UNE PHÉNOMÉNOLOGIE NON-SYMBOLIQUE
FROM HUSSERL’S ANTEPREDICATIVE TO GARELLI’S PROTO-ONTIC AND TO RICHIR’S CLIGNOTEMENT - FOR A NON-SYMBOLIC PHENOMENOLOGY

Summary/Abstract: From Husserl’s Antepredicative to Garelli’s Proto-Ontic and to Richir’s Clignotement - for a Non-Symbolic Phenomenology. This article deals in a comparative way with the problem of the antepredicative area in Husserl’s works concerning the experience and judgement and the passive synthesis, in Garelli’s proto-ontic horizon and in Richir’s theory of the clignotement and of qualia. Husserl proposes a new approach in understanding the concepts of experience and judgement by focusing upon their antepredicative horizon as an Urdoxa, a „science” prior to the logical operations. Therefore, the original belief authorises the predicative level and the antepredicative evidence that opens new ways of investigating the field prior to what we usually understand in our judgements by the experience of being obvious. Jacques Garelli develops the antepredicative field in his theory of a proto-ontic world of the aesthetic logos that aims toward the prereflexive and prethematical area of knowledge and towards redefining this knowledge in terms of resonating transversal rhythms that attribute the phenomenon a structure of a poem or of a work of art. Marc Richir goes further with the structure of the phenomenon understood as a moving texture of fragments of worlds (of language) outside the symbolic institutions of society, culture, habits. He defines knowledge as a result of operating a hyperbolic reduction in the instant of the sublime experience, using the phenomenological liberty to express it, a consequence of the clignotement of qualia that organizes every human experience (of life) from the third level of passive synthesis. The phenomenological liberty supposes discovering the non-symbolic laws that govern the aesthetic logos of the antepredicative area by using the four steps of the transcendental eidetic without concepts.

• Details
• Contents