Decreasing the Number of Judicial Errors from the Perspective of Synergological Expertise in Romania
Decreasing the Number of Judicial Errors from the Perspective of Synergological Expertise in Romania

Author(s): Dan Cristian
Subject(s): Criminal Law, Behaviorism
Published by: Scientia Moralitas Research Institute
Keywords: civil law; psychology; criminal law
Summary/Abstract: The administration of justice in any state in the world is done by people and is therefore not perfect. Judicial errors can occur for various reasons, most often the subjective human factor that leads to final court decisions that can affect the entire existence of a suspect. There have been countless cases in which those sentenced by final and irrevocable sentences to years of imprisonment have been acquitted before serving their sentences, as it has been shown that the criminal act allegedly committed by them was in fact committed by another perpetrator. At other times, the acquittal decision was taken after the convict had fully completed the sentence, which produced its legal effect only for the rehabilitation institution. The article aims to analyze some of these judicial errors, the causes that determine them and their effects on the life course of the individual suspected of committing an illegal act, for different branches of law, from the perspective of synergological science. Some conclusions drawn at the end of the paper will aim to strengthen the arguments presented regarding the benefit of a forensic synergological expertise.

• Details
• Contents