The Latest Legislative Changes of the Administrative Litigation Law No. 554 of 2004
The Latest Legislative Changes of the Administrative Litigation Law No. 554 of 2004

Author(s): Adriana Deac
Subject(s): Public Administration, Sociology of Law, Administrative Law
Published by: ADJURIS – International Academic Publisher
Keywords: administrative litigation; responsibility; head of the institution; regressive action; administrative act; judicial fine; legal person; institution or public authority; final court decision;
Summary/Abstract: Recently, the Administrative Litigation Law no. 554 of 2004 was amended successively, in a very short period of time. This unusual fact caught my attention and led me to scientifically analyze these legislative changes. It is very true that the entire normative act was not amended, but only certain articles regarding the procedure for resolving administrative law disputes, namely the suspension of the execution of the disputed administrative act, the forced execution of final court decisions and the regressive action granted to the public institution against the official or dignitary who improperly issued, late or did not issue the administrative act in dispute. It is obvious that the changes made to the law were imposed by the practical demands of resolving administrative law disputes. The scientific approach aims to analyze the specific changes made to the Administrative Litigation Law no. 554 of 2004, to criticize them, identifying the positive and negative aspects, if any. Also, considering that jurisprudence was the one that imposed these changes, I will try to identify some court decisions relevant to this scientific approach.

• Details
• Contents