URMĂRILE DIFERITELOR TIPOLOGII DE GÂNDIRE ALE UNUI GRUP ASUPRA COMPORTAMENTULUI ORGANIZAȚIONAL
THE CONSEQUENCES OF DIFFERENT TYPES OF THINKING OF A GROUP ON ORGANIZATIONAL BEHAVIOR

Author(s): George-Cosmin Mitu, Alice-Florina Bodea
Subject(s): Social Sciences, Education, Law, Constitution, Jurisprudence, Communication studies
Published by: Academia de Poliţie »Alexandru Ioan Cuza« Bucureşti
Keywords: understanding; collective organization; group science; teamwork; leadership
Summary/Abstract: We can define groupthink as the tendency of a group of people to arrive at extremist or unrealistic ideas. People in cohesive groups engage in groupthink when they neglect to explore alternative viewpoints because they are forced to reach consensus, which usually leads to more unfavorable judgments. Groupthink refers to the tendency of a group of people to come to absurd or unrealistic conclusions. People in cohesive groups engage in groupthink when they neglect to explore alternative viewpoints because they are forced to reach consensus, which usually leads to more unfavorable judgments.For example, group members may ignore or dismiss material with which they disagree with the conclusion that has been made and may be very disagreeable to those who disagree with that conclusion.

• Details
• Contents