Examen selectiv din practica judiciară a Secţiei de contencios administrativ şi fiscal a Înaltei Curţi de Casaţie şi Justiţie
Decizia nr. 2355/5 iunie 2015 Înalta Curte de Casaţie şi Justiţie - Secţia de Contencios Administrativ şi Fiscal
More...We kindly inform you that, as long as the subject affiliation of our 300.000+ articles is in progress, you might get unsufficient or no results on your third level or second level search. In this case, please broaden your search criteria.
Decizia nr. 2355/5 iunie 2015 Înalta Curte de Casaţie şi Justiţie - Secţia de Contencios Administrativ şi Fiscal
More...
Decizia nr. 542 din 26 februarie 2016 – Înalta Curte de Casaţie şi Justiţie, Secţia de contencios administrativ şi fiscal
More...
Decizia nr. 718 din 11 martie 2016 – Înalta Curte de Casaţie şi Justiţie, Secţia de contencios administrativ şi fiscal
More...
Decizia nr. 2687 din 20 octombrie 2016 – Înalta Curte de Casaţie și Justiţie, Secţia de contencios administrativ și fiscal Decizia nr. 2684 din 20 octombrie 2016 – Înalta Curte de Casaţie și Justiţie, Secţia de contencios administrativ și fiscal Decizia nr. 2689/20 octombrie 2016 – Înalta Curte de Casaţie și Justiţie, Secţia de contencios administrativ și fiscal
More...
Decizia nr. 2 din 17 ianuarie 2017 – Înalta Curte de Casație și Justiție, Secția de contencios administrativ și fiscal Decizia nr. 3 din 17 ianuarie 2017 – Înalta Curte de Casație și Justiție, Secția de contencios administrativ și fiscal Decizia nr. 10 din 17 ianuarie 2017 – Înalta Curte de Casație și Justiție, Secția de contencios administrativ și fiscal
More...
Decizia nr. 3418 din 7 noiembrie 2017 – Înalta Curte de Casaţie şi Justiţie, Secţia de contencios administrativ şi fiscal Decizia nr. 3425 din 7 noiembrie 2017 – Înalta Curte de Casaţie şi Justiţie, Secţia de contencios administrativ şi fiscal Decizia nr. 3419 din 7 noiembrie 2017 – Înalta Curte de Casaţie şi Justiţie, Secţia de contencios administrativ şi fiscal
More...
The most striking expression of the social fact is the social norm. Man's social existence cannot be conceived without norms, mainly moral, religious and legal, that regulate and even determine the behavior of the human person in the social environment. The existence of any individual as a social being presupposes a series of obligations exercised throughout his life cycle, materialized in a series of norms, some of which complement each other, others appear contradictory to others, being specific to different interest groups. This system of rules is a condition for the existence of society's life, a mechanism that requires good management of human relations and removes the imminent danger of chaos. Social norms are imposed, promoted and perpetuated by several methods that we will analyze in our study Regardless of the field they regulate, social norms contain rules addressed to individuals, describing and detailing the ways in which values must be translated into legitimate behaviors and accepted by society. As social relations are extremely varied, a diversity of social norms that regulate these relations is also outlined. Thus, the system of social norms consists of the following groups: ethical norms, ordinary norms (customs), corporate norms, religious norms and legal norms. There are also technical norms that are not part of social determinism because they do not regulate social relations. Regarding the complex relationship between the normative legal system and, on the other hand, society, it can be seen that currently the legal system tends to have its own functional autonomy, apart from the objective or subjective determinations that society transmits. The autonomy of the judiciary tries to transform itself from a secondary, phenomenological and ideational structure, into one with its own reality, with the power to impose its order on the social and natural order. In this study we also analyze aspects of the work of normative codification.
More...
Our research aims to better understand how public institutions have implemented the rules that guarantee the effective exercise of the right of the civil servant to refuse to sign administrative acts. Law 140/2017 and the 2019 Administrative Code granted the civil servants the right of refusals to sign. These laws protects public sector employees when they raise flags over illegal activities within a government organization. The paper investigates the background procedure that enables effective exercise of refusals to sign right. We seek to better understand how public entities have implemented the rules that guarantee the effective exercise of the right of the civil servant to refuse to sign administrative acts. Trough data collection and analysis, we assess the performance of public entities legal counteractive measures such as the elaboration of the procedure and the book keeping of refusals to sign in a public register published on paper and digital. Our goal is to improve current situation and to make recommendations that lead to limitation of politics influence and ensure the neutrality of civil servants in the exercise of their duties.
More...
Decizia nr. 4649 din 18 decembrie 2018 – ÎNALTA CURTE DE CASAŢIE ŞI JUSTIŢIE – Secţia de Contencios Administrativ şi Fiscal Decizia nr. 4599 din 17 decembrie 2018 – ÎNALTA CURTE DE CASAŢIE ŞI JUSTIŢIE – Secţia de Contencios Administrativ şi Fiscal Decizia nr. 4595 din 17 decembrie 2018 – ÎNALTA CURTE DE CASAŢIE ŞI JUSTIŢIE – Secţia de Contencios Administrativ şi Fiscal Decizia nr. 4499 din 13 decembrie 2018 – ÎNALTA CURTE DE CASAŢIE ŞI JUSTIŢIE – Secţia de Contencios Administrativ şi Fiscal
More...
Review of: Cristian Clipa, Fundamentele ideologice ale dreptului administrativ. Vol. II. Tomul 1. Dialogurile, Tomul 2. Specificitățile, Editura Hamangiu, București 2021
More...
Consiliul științific al Academiei de Științe Juridice din România (înființată prin Legea nr. 139/2015) s-a întrunit în zilele de 8-10 iulie 2022 în cadrul sesiunii științifice ordinare pentru dezbaterea planului de activități specifice momentului. Organizarea dezbaterii consiliului a revenit și de această dată vicepreședintelui Academiei Române, domnul prof. univ. dr. Liviu Bogdan Ciucă. Spunem că a revenit și de această dată, amintindu-ne noi de precedenta și splendida reuniune din 30 august – 1 septembrie 2019, gazdă fiind atunci „Domeniile Panciu”. La succesul sesiunii au fost asociați: Camera Notarilor Publici Galați și Facultatea de drept și științe administrative, Universitatea „Dunărea de Jos” din Galați. Sesiunea a debutat cum nu se putea de bine, printr-o splendidă și plină de învățăminte conferință susținută de remarcabilul om de știință, prof. dr. Dumitru Constantin Dulcan, cunoscut mediului științific național și internațional pentru lucrările sale: Inteligența materiei, Oglinda conștiinței, Mintea de dincolo ș.a.
More...
În perioada 3-8 iulie 2022, a avut loc în București, pentru prima dată în România, Congresului mondial de filosofie a dreptului și filosofie socială (IVR). Această ediție, jubiliară, cu numărul 30 a Congreselor IVR, a fost concepută sub egida spirituală a Asociației Române de Filosofie a Dreptului (ARFD) în parteneriat cu Universitatea Creștină Dimitrie Cantemir (UCDC), în calitate de universitate organizatoare.
More...
The SARS-CoV-2 pandemic introduced a genuine threat to the possibility of the Sejm conducting its constitutional functions. The pandemic and the necessity of ensuring the safety of the members of the Sejm and employees of the chancellery of the Sejm compelled lawmakers to adopt appropriate legal arrangements in relation to the organisational aspects of the work of the Sejm and its official bodies. The amendment of the Standing Orders of the Sejm passed on March 26th 2020 introduced the possibility of the Sejm’s parliamentary sessions, the Presidium of the Sejm, Council of Seniors, Committees and Subcommittees to take place remotely utilising electronic means of communication. Parliamentary proceedings became conditional not only on the introduction of a state of pandemic, but also one of the states of emergency. The wording of the amendment detailed the new institutions and the legal bases of new procedural solutions (the Standing Orders of the Sejm, Orders of the Marshal of the Sejm) and recognised the practical problems associated with this mode of procedure.
More...
In the digital age, databases are becoming a much more valuable recource for historians. From the abstract perspective, as an archive of the Grand Duchy of Lithuania, the Lithuanian Metrica has signs indicating that it is a massive database. Appropriate methods are needed to command such a large amount of information. A prosopography questionnaire lets us pick up data points from the Lithuanian Metrica, which is very useful for researching groups of persons from the governing body of the Grand Duchy of Lithuania. For example, with the help of a prosopographical questionnaire, we can extract specific data – personal, biographical, political career, social, economical – regarding officers who served under the Grand Duchy of Lithuania in the sixteenth century. LM’s judicial documents, privileges, and testaments are a great source of data for onomastics and reconstructions of marital statuses and social networks. Testaments also accurately indicate dates of death as well as the economical capital of the deceased. Military lists also give us a massive amount of information regarding the economical and political influence of a person. Unfortunately, the amount of type of sources are inconsistent, and a lot of persons from the researched group have “blind spots” on their prosopographical questionnaires. This reason can be partially resolved, as different types of sources in the LM can provide similar data, and thus make the prosopographical method a very useful tool for working with the LM.
More...
The article present the obstacles and difficulties that the Polish legislator will face when regulating the matter of CHF loans indexed/denominated. The aim of the study is to provide answers to questions regarding the legal and socio-economic justification of such imperious interference in credit contractual relations. By applying the formal-dogmatic method, and taking into account the theoretical and legal conclusions regarding legisprudence, it was established that any possible legislative intervention may meet with social resistance, difficulties in the field of legislative technique and cause negative economic effects.
More...
The subject of this article is the issue of a clarifying amendment, understood as a legislative change of the legal text, which assumes no interference with the originally shaped normative content. As a result of such an action of the lawmaker, only the legal text is changed, while the normative content remains unchanged, despite the different wording of the provisions. Such an amendment does not introduce a normative novum, and thus it is neutral from the normative perspective and has exclusively textual character. In the adopted terminological convention a legislative change with such characteristics is referred to as a non-normative legislative change. The aim of the analysis carried out at the theoretical level is to verify the possibility of considering certain legislative changes as non-normative, purely textual changes. In relation to the practice of making and applying the law, the analysis has focused on the problem of admissibility of the lawmaker’s assumption on the non-normative character of certain changes which he decides to introduce by way of legislative intervention, and on the problem of identification of such changes in the process of applying the law. The analysis of the undertaken problematic has been based on theoretical and methodological assumptions of the Poznan-Szczecin school, taking into account in particular the fundamental conceptual distinction between a rule and a legal norm, as well as the assumption of the systemic character of law as a set of appropriately ordered norms, the content of which is recreated by means of interpretation. The analytical paradigm has been supplemented with threads of functional analysis. The findings made in relation to the content of legal norms were based on the legal-dogmatic method. The findings allow the conclusion that the non-normative legislative change should be regarded as acceptable for the theory of law, and from the perspective of legislation, acceptable and purposeful, and in some cases even necessary. It corresponds with the intuitions of legal practice and at the same time can be included in the conceptual net of the theory of law - being within the scope of the paradigmatic model of the system of law consisting of norms, and not of legal regulations or normative acts. The assumption of exclusively textual character of certain amendments to the law is also supported by the principles of legislative technique. An amendment of a provision without the intention to change the legal norm is conditioned solely by the need to make the legal text more legible by modifying the linguistic construction, which reveals a certain dysfunction in the process of exegesis of the legal text. In the event that the effect of this dysfunction is irremovable, and at the same time interferes substantially with the original assumption of the lawmaker as to the scope of application of a legal norm or the scope of normalization, a situation enforcing legislative intervention arises, the purpose of which is to eliminate the perceived defect of the legal text. However, the final effect of such a change does not depend on the lawmaker. The decision as to whether the change is in fact normatively neutral and will be understood as such will be made in the process of applying the law. The intended character of the change introduced by the lawmaker in individual cases may turn out to be inadequate, unclear, or for other reasons not respected in the process of applying the law. The body applying the law must accept the non-normative character of a change in the law with great caution. In this respect, a rebuttable presumption of the normative character of a change in law should be made, with the possibility of breaking this presumption in the process of interpretation with the use of sufficiently strong argumentation. Only in such a case can a change in the law be regarded as a purely textual change.
More...
The title “spiral of formalism” is understood as a situation in which legislative intervention, justified by the elimination of legal barriers, does not solve the essence of the problem, and causes additional formal barriers. The “spiral of formalism” can be analyzed in the wider issue of inflation (overproduction) of law. The purpose of this article is to identify sources and consequences of this phenomenon on the example of the institution of a local initiative introduced in 2010. This study first presents the results of historical legal research in which the reason for the 2010 legal intervention was sought. Then, on the basis of a theoretical and dogmatic legal analysis, the appropriateness of introducing a central regulation of the local initiative was considered. Finally, the results of empirical research on the basis of which the practice of functioning of the local initiative was diagnosed were presented. As a result of the conducted analyzes, an answer was given to the research question – Have formal barriers, in the scope of joint performance of public tasks with the direct participation of residents, been eliminated by introducing the central regulation of the institution of local initiative?
More...