ПОСТМОДЕРНИ УТОПИЗАМ И „ПОСЛЕДЊИ ЧОВJЕК“

Author(s): Predrag Živković / Language(s): Serbian Issue: 4/2015

The work clearly indicates the nature of postmodern and post-modernism, as well as new epochal givens post-postmodern, who became paradigmatic refuge of what is now manifested in the forms of liberal democracy and neoliberal capitalism. The intention of the authors focused on the possibility of a different perceptionof human existence, that its center of gravity will not rely on inaugurated a simulacrum of postmodernism, but the new sources of identity recognition. In order to clearly display the postmodern identity and with а designated dose critical review against the grafts that are the result of postmodernism in the paper, with special attention we look back on the restriction of the subject as free actor. When we say free actor, we think first of all a man who claimed his center in your inner being, and not in the external items. However, postmodernism greatly contributes to the creation of an subject that concentrates the focus of their things, causing their own identification with things, while in the realm of things offered increasingly becoming someone who is consumed and less someone who is ready I create. Postmodernism produces a complete indifference to the antinomies that are not synchronized opposing one another. It is about recognizing the post-modern totalitarianism that has been made, ideological revocation of history, with the aim of glorifying liberal epistemology.

La deconstruction du sujet dans les philosophies contemporaines en Europe

Author(s): Jean-Jacques Wunenburger / Language(s): French Issue: 1-2/2015

La philosophie européenne du 20ème siècle abandonne en grandepartie le paradigme du rationalisme qui a cherché depuis Descartes à comprendrel’organisation et l’intelligibilité du monde à partir du point de vue d’un sujet, soitabsolu, c’est-à-dire Dieu, soit humain, l’un et l’autre se trouvant dotés d’entendement et devolonté, fondements de leur liberté. Psychanalyse, phénoménologie puis herméneutiquecontinentales, philosophie du langage (structuraliste) et philosophies de la différence déconstructiviste,vont au 20ème siècle relativiser la position du sujet conscient de soi défini parsa maîtrise de soi et des objets. La philosophie va ainsi explorer, interpréter, légitimer unsujet traversé par l’ombre et la fragilité, par des relations d’entrelacement avec le monde, parde discursivités langagières ouvertes sur les interstices du sens, dotée d’une forme d’actionfaite de passivité et retenue (allant vers l’inaction), Ces orientations, tendances, oeuvresaccompagnent une lente conversion du rationalisme occidental et préparent sans doutedes portes de passage, des conditions de dialogues inédites, avec les pensées asiatiques, quisous bien des rapports n’ont pas développé une philosophie du sujet, au sens européen, etont donc exploré d’autres modes de pensée que la philosophie européenne contemporaineest en train de découvrir.

Pasivnost i niveliranje

Author(s): Dragan Prole / Language(s): Serbian Issue: 1/2016

The first part of this paper explores the kinship in diagnosis of contemporaneity of Hugo Ball and Martin Heidegger. Both thinkers recognize leveling as an important trait of their age. In Ball’s terms, leveling is identified with the apocalyptic abolishment of humanity. That happens by equalizing all of human creation, which becomes possible only after the abolishment of the hierarchy of values, thanks to which it was previously possible to distinguish a work of art from an average work. With Heidegger, leveling is equated with the perverted forms of curiosity. Unlike the former forms of curiosity, coupled by the common desire for deeper insight, modern curiosity is fairly superficial, let loose with no boundaries to all the impressions which supersede the expected and already seen. In the second part of the paper, Husserl’s term of passive synthesis is examined, so we can observe the intervention of phenomenology from the perspective of deconstruction of the effects of leveling. I conclude with a warning that we cannot protect ourselves from the world to which we are exposed by natural subjectivity and conventional forms of knowledge. Which insight leads us to revert to the sources of subjectivity, the idea common to both the avant-garde and the phenomenologists.

Krytyka nuklearna

Author(s): Andrzej Marzec / Language(s): Polish Issue: 01/2014

The essay reflects on the issue of the apocalypse, the possibility of absolute destruction, the end of the world, and presents the phenomenon of nuclear criticism, a school of thought directly related to the arms race and the Cold War. To this end, the text analyzes the lines of reasoning contained in Liam Sprod’s book "Nuclear Futurism", in particular, the similarities between the futuristic discourse of early 20th century and the apocalyptic visions of total annihilation dominant in the latter half of the century. In its characterization of the phenomenon of the apocalypse, the essay also refers to two little-known texts by Derrida: “No Apocalypse, Not Now” and “Of an Apocalyptic Tone Recently Adopted in Philosophy”. The author, following Derrida’s thought, sees the apocalypse itself as a phenomenon belonging to the world of literature, while the greatest potential disaster is seen as being the threat of its embodiment, of a total revealing of truth.

Polish Philosophy versus European Philosophy

Author(s): Marek Rembierz / Language(s): English Issue: 1/2015

review of: ----------------- Filozofia polska na tle filozofii europejskiej w XX wieku Ed. Maciej Woźniczka, 614 pp., Częstochowa: Wyd. Akademii im. Jana Długosza (JDU), 2014

Emil Cioran şi Bucur Ţincu [mărturii şi documente]

Author(s): Marin Diaconu / Language(s): Romanian Issue: 11/2015

Emil Cioran and Bucur Ţincu friendship is the longest in the life of the philosopher on the heights of despair. This friendship started in the childhood, while playing, continued at school, and became even stronger during the university years and during the courses of specialization, unrelenting over time, when they were separated by thousands of kilometers and ideological fears.

Lucian Blaga, filosof al culturii (text inedit)

Author(s): Dumitru Isac / Language(s): Romanian Issue: 11/2015

Misao i djelo Muhameda Filipovića uz sedamdesetu godišnjicu

Author(s): Salih Fočo / Language(s): Bosnian Issue: 01+02/2000

Prof. Filipović je neobična ličnost, nekonvencionalan, erudita, čovjek tradicije i reda koji je naslijedio još iz ugledne obitelji. Tragajući za naučnom spoznajom školovao se u Banjoj Luci, gdje je i rođen, zatim Beogradu, Zagrebu, Moskvi, Londonu i mnogim drugim naučnim i kulturnim centrima.

ИНТЕНЦИОНАЛЬНОСТЬ: АМЕРИКАНСКАЯ ТОЧКА ЗРЕНИЯ

Author(s): Sergey NIKONENKO / Language(s): Russian Issue: 1/2017

The matter of the article is to give an outline of American theories of intentionality and to compare it with E. Husserl’s phenomenology. It is one of the first Russian systematic studies of American theories on intentionality that is represented here. It is John Searle’s philosophy that is the main American theory of intentionality. Some other thinkers (R. Chisholm, J. Findlay, N. Rescher, E. Thompson, D. W. Smith, etc.) are studied here too. Searle treats intentionality as a natural quality of consciousness. He forbids the linguistic approach; intentionality is understood from the point of view of humanistic (internal) realism. Intentionality is successive when the subject is satisfied by his acquaintance with the object. The main feature of intentionality is aspectuality that has the subject of not eliminated subjectivity of any conscious act and the first person ontology. Searle proposes the collective intentionality that is analogous to phenomenological intersubjectivity. E. Thompson proposes the synthetic theory of intentionality that unites phenomenology, philosophy of consciousness and neural science. D. W. Smith proposes the theory of intentional context. He rejects the study of atomistic intentional acts. Husserl’s and Searle’s theories of phenomenology may be united in several main points: 1. Experience is an internal process; 2. Experience cannot be separated of aspectuality; 3. Intentionality cannot be eliminated in any conscious act; 4. The other mind can be considered only from internal point of view; 5. There is collective intentionality of mankind. There are several distinctions between Husserl and Searle: 1. Searle is a realist on intentionality, Husserl puts on an idealistic concept of it; 2. Searle considers intentionality from empirical point of view, not from the rationalist one; 3. Searle is an adept of skepticism about self, he rejects transcendental concept of cogito. But irrespective of distinctions there is convergence of analytical and phenomenological views in contemporary philosophy of consciousness.

МЕЖДУНАРОДНЫЙ ПРОЕКТ КАФЕДРЫ ФИЛОСОФИИ ПСТГУ (ПРАВОСЛАВНЫЙ СВЯТО-ТИХОНОВСКИЙ ГУМАНИТАРНЫЙ УНИВЕРСИТЕТ) РОССИЙСКО-ФРАНЦУЗСКОЕ СОТРУДНИЧЕСТВО В ОБЛАСТИ ФИЛОСОФСКОЙ КУЛЬТУРЫ

Author(s): The Editorial Board HORIZON / Language(s): Russian Issue: 2/2014

АНОНС МЕЖДУНАРОДНОЙ НАУЧНОЙ КОНФЕРЕНЦИИ ЕДИНСТВО СОЗНАНИЯ: ФЕНОМЕНОЛОГИЧЕСКИЙ И КОГНИТИВНЫЙ АСПЕКТЫ

Author(s): The Editorial Board HORIZON / Language(s): Russian Issue: 1/2014

МИХАИЛ СЕМЁНОВИЧ УВАРОВ 1955–2013

Author(s): The Editorial Board HORIZON / Language(s): Russian Issue: 1/2014

Роман Анатольевич Громов (03.01.1970-04.05.2014)

Author(s): The Editorial Board HORIZON / Language(s): Russian Issue: 1/2014

БЕСЕДА С А. В. АХУТИНЫМ (Москва, 26 декабря 2012 г.)

Author(s): / Language(s): Russian Issue: 2/2013

Anatoly Akhutin describes the original intention that led him to philosophy and stresses several definingmoments. Those include the relationship of Anatoly Akhutin with his teacher Vladimir Bibler,Akhutin’s understanding of the place of his own thought among his predecessors in philosophy andAkhutin’s definition of the essence of philosophy as that which deals with the origin and can be seenas the logic of the origin. He also considers the relation of the particularity of a philosopher and theessence of philosophy. The contemporary situation inclines Akhutin to address such topics as the definitionof philosophy as a science, philosophical definition of science, the role of analytical philosophy incontemporary philosophical discourse and place of philosophy at Universitis.

Научная конференция «СОВРЕМЕННАЯ ОНТОЛОГИЯ — V: СУЩЕЕ И СУЩНОСТЬ» (18 — 20 июня 2012 г., Санкт-Петербург)

Author(s): Andrei Patkul / Language(s): Russian Issue: 2/2013

The fifth conference in the series «Contemporary ontology» was devoted to the problems of relationsof existence and essence in such aspects as the relation of existence and essence from the point of viewof several fundamental contemporary approaches. These approaches include phenomenological andanalytical perspective; classical and non-classical ontology; static and dynamic representation. The declaredtheme has been extended by discussing the problems of multitude, of absolute and relative, theformally logical and philosophical nature of problems of existence.

Обзор. Международная конференция «Натуралистические концепции сознания» (24 — 25 Мая, Санкт-Петербург, Россия)

Author(s): Natalia Yastreb / Language(s): Russian Issue: 2/2013

The conference provided an excellent opportunity for interdisciplinary interaction between philosophers,linguists, psychologists and neuroscientists, all united by their interest in a naturalistic approachto consciousness. The key speakers were famous philosophers and scientists, including John Searle,Thomas Metzinger and Konstantin Anokhin. The topics of the reports covered a great variety of issues,ranging from the relation of the ontological subjectivity and epistemic objectivity of consciousness; thestudy of consciousness and self-consciousness through the phenomena associated with various formsof bodily experience; the search for the conceptual bases for the scientific study of consciousness, theproblem of qualia, attention, free will and various aspects of philosophy of psychology.

Обзор. Международная конференция Современная онтология — VI: Два взгляда — Россия и Италия (25 — 29 июня 2013, Санкт-Петербург, Россия)

Author(s): Kira Maidachenko / Language(s): Russian Issue: 2/2013

The conference comprised the work in nine distinct but interrelated research fields: theory and categoriesof ontology, classical and nonclassical ontologies, ontology and gnoseology, formal ontology,the ontology and philosophical anthropology, history of Western ontology, modern philosophy in Italy,history of ontology in Russia, ontology and particular sciences. Reports of the participants were notgrouped formally, but rather formed the network of the interrelated discussion fields.

АНОНС: МЕЖДУНАРОДНАЯ КОНФЕРЕНЦИЯ ПО ПРОБЛЕМАМ ФИЛОСОФИИ И МЕТОДОЛОГИИ ГУМАНИТАРНЫХ ИССЛЕДОВАНИЙ «ГУМАНИТАРНЫЕ НАУКИ И (ИЛИ) ГУМАНИТАРНОЕ ЗНАНИЕ»

Author(s): The Editorial Board HORIZON / Language(s): Russian Issue: 2/2013

Анонс V Хайдеггеровской конференции «СВОБОДА И СУДЬБА. ПУТИ МЫСЛИ С ХАЙДЕГГЕРОМ И ПОСЛЕ ХАЙДЕГГЕРА» (22 — 25 мая 2014, Месскирх, Германия)

Author(s): The Editorial Board HORIZON / Language(s): Russian Issue: 2/2013

Анонс международной конференции «РЕАЛЬНО ЛИ ЭТО? ФЕНОМЕНОЛОГИИ ВООБРАЖАЕМОГО»

Author(s): The Editorial Board HORIZON / Language(s): Russian Issue: 2/2013