Glosa do wyroku Sądu najwyższego z dnia 22 czerwca 2021 roku (sygn. II dk 56/211)
Commentary on the judgment of the Supreme court of the republic of poland of 22 June 2021, II dk 56/21

Summary/Abstract: The commentary presents the problem of not specifying the disciplinary tort that violated the Code of Ethics for Attorney at Law. The overly general formulation of unlawfulness characteristics is the reason for the inability to classify behavior as aprohibited act. The Supreme Court emphasized that the description of the alleged act in the proceedings must be very precise so that it is obvious what actions are allowed and which are prohibited. The aim of the commentary is to draw attention to the issue of standards of proceedings, in particular to the precise definition of acriminal act.1 Wyrok Sądu Najwyższego zdnia 22lipca 2021roku, II DK 56/21, LEX nr 3352461.Studenckie Prace Prawnicze, Administratywistyczne i Ekonomiczne 47, 2024 © for this edition by CNS

• Details
• Contents