Studia Neo(Latina) rediviva. A Few Remarks on and Postulates for Neo-Latin studies Cover Image

Studia (neo)latina rediviva. Kilka uwag i postulatów odnośnie neolatynistyki
Studia Neo(Latina) rediviva. A Few Remarks on and Postulates for Neo-Latin studies

Author(s): Wojciech Ryczek, Michał Czerenkiewicz
Subject(s): Literary Texts
Published by: Wydawnictwo Uniwersytetu Jagiellońskiego
Keywords: neo-Latin studies; literary criticism; editing of neo-Latin texts; translation studies

Summary/Abstract: The main aim of the paper is to present the major perspectives on some of the most important issues related to contemporary neo-Latin studies. Their status as an autonomous discipline independent from classical philology is still an object of many contemporary disputes and controversies among the philologists and historians of literature, philosophy (ideas) or culture. One promoter of neo-Latin studies in Poland, Maria Cytowska, claimed that these studies are a branch derived from classical philology and aimed at neo-Latin literature flourishing in Europe from the fourteenth century until nowadays. According to this view, strongly related to the estimation and hierarchisation of both disciplines, neo-Latin studies appear to be subordinated to their – metaphorically speaking– ‘older sister’, namely classical philology. The question concerning the perspectives in studies on neo-Latin texts is always involved in a much more complicated question about their disciplinary status and boundaries.

  • Issue Year: 15/2013
  • Issue No: 3 (28)
  • Page Range: 335-358
  • Page Count: 24
  • Language: Polish
Toggle Accessibility Mode