KONTYNUUJĄC ROZMOWĘ... W nawiązaniu do wypowiedzi Agnieszki Lekkiej-Kowalik „O konsekwencjach dwuznaczności terminu «tożsamość osobowa». Uwagi po lekturze książki Grażyny Osiki «Tożsamość osobowa w epoce cyfrowych technologii komunikacyjnych»”
Continuing the Dialogue… In Reply to Agnieszka Lekka-Kowalik’s Paper “On the Consequences of the Ambiguity of the Term ‘Personal Identity’: Some Remarks on Grażyna Osika’s Book Tożsamość osobowa w epoce cyfrowych technologii komunikacyjnych”

Summary/Abstract: The present considerations attempt to establish a dialogue between the classical understanding of the human person, represented by Agnieszka Lekka-Kowalik, and the proposal to defi ne ‘personal identity’ as the communication environment. For this purpose it was important to recognize areas common to both conceptions, such as the fundamental experience of being and the awareness of one’s ontological coherence and uniqueness. Additionally, in trying to address the question of who we are social references needed to be taken into account. The differences between the two approaches in question concerning the issue of ‘personal identity’ have been indicated and the areas demanding further analytical work in the communication model as well as in the classical approach have been identified.

• Details
• Contents