Standardul de probă a vătămării procesuale în cazul nulității actelor procesual penale
Standard of proof of the processual injury in the case of nullity of the criminal processual acts
Author(s): Mihai Giurgea, Ioan LazărSubject(s): Law, Constitution, Jurisprudence
Published by: Uniunea Juriștilor din România
Keywords: injury in the criminal trial; criminal processual sanctions; nullity; standard of proof; criminal processual acts;
Summary/Abstract: The most controversial aspect in the criminal judicial practice, in the situation of invoking the plea of relative nullity of a criminal processual act, is to prove the existence of a processual injury and, related thereto, to prove the sufficient seriousness of the injury caused to the party or to the main processual subject which justifies the cancellation of the act. Most of the times, the party or the subject that invokes the nullity is put in the extremely difficult position to persuade the judicial body that processual injury is sufficiently serious to justify the drastic sanction of nullity. That is why we have considered that it is required a thorough assessment with regard to the standard of probation of injury, of proving the sufficient seriousness of the injury suffered in order to bring about the sanction of nullity. The conclusion we have reached is that the processual injury suffered is sufficient to bring about the sanction of nullity when the violation of the processual rights or guarantees of the parties or of the subjects puts them in the position to no longer be able to defend themselves with the same chance they would have defended themselves if their processual rights had not been infringed.
Journal: Revista „Dreptul”
- Issue Year: 2018
- Issue No: 04
- Page Range: 142-152
- Page Count: 11
- Language: Romanian
- Content File-PDF