Umijeće nelogičnog zaključivanja: Povodom odluke Ustavnog suda Bosne i Hercegovine – U 2/11 (Ocjena ustavnosti Zakona o budžetu Republike Srpske za 2011. i Odluke o usvajanju budžeta Republike Srpske za 2011.)
The Art of Irrelevant Conclusion: On the Decision of the Constitutional Court of Bosnia and Herzegovina - In 2/11 (Assessment of the Constitutionality of the Republika Srpska Budget Law for 2011 and the Decision on the Budget of the Republika Srpska

Author(s): Aida Hunček-Pita
Subject(s): Law, Constitution, Jurisprudence, Constitutional Law, Public Law, Evaluation research, Law on Economics, Fiscal Politics / Budgeting
Published by: Fondacija Centar za javno pravo
Keywords: Public law; constitution; Constitutional Court; BiH; RS; Law on Budget; constitutionality; Law on Fiscal Council;
Summary/Abstract: The Constitutional Court of Bosnia and Herzegovina has issued a Decision number 2/11 which states that the submitted claim is groundless, and that the National Assembly of the Republika Srpska, in it’s act regarding adoption of the Budget for 2011. and its Decision of the Execution of the Budget of the Republika Srpska for 2011, did not violated provisions of the Constitution of Bosnia and Herzegovina, which prescribe obligation of entities and other administrative units to respect Constitution of Bosnia and Herzegovina, laws at the state level as well as decision of government institutions. The Constitutional Court in its explanation states that by adoption of the disputed documents, the provisions of the Law at the state level in the field of indirect taxation have not been violated. However, the applicant has never mentioned the fact that the National Assembly of the Republika Srpska had violated the provisions of the law in the field of indirect taxation. Instead it is only mentioned the violation of procedure prescribed by the Law on Fiscal Council of Bosnia and Herzegovina.

• Details
• Contents